Start here · the long version
What synonyms really asks you to do
Swapping the words that carry the meaning for others that carry the same meaning — and knowing which words in a prompt are not allowed to move at all.
What a synonym actually is
A synonym is not a word that means roughly the same thing. It is a word you can put in this sentence, in this position, without changing what the sentence claims. That last part is what makes synonym work harder than it looks: “important” and “vital” sit in the same dictionary entry and make different claims. If the prompt says a policy is important and you write that it is vital, you have committed the rest of your essay to defending something the prompt never said.
This is why word lists fail. A list gives you words that are related; it cannot tell you whether the one you picked fits the slot you are putting it in. Two things decide that. Strength is how much the word claims — “dislike”, “oppose” and “condemn” run from mild to severe and are not interchangeable. Company is what the word is allowed to stand next to: you make a decision and you reach a conclusion, and crossing the two produces English that is grammatical and that nobody writes.
The practical consequence runs against instinct. You should swap fewer words, more carefully, than you want to. A response that replaces four content words accurately reads better than one that replaces nine and gets two of them wrong — because the two wrong ones are the ones the examiner notices, and they are noticed as errors rather than as ambition.
StrengthHow much the word claims. “Significant” reports size; “vital” reports necessity. Swapping one for the other rewrites the claim.
Company (collocation)What the word may stand next to. “Make a decision” and “reach a conclusion” are fixed pairs; crossing them is the error no spell-checker sees.
RegisterHow formal it is. “Kids”, “a lot of” and “stuff” all have neutral equivalents that cost nothing to use and are noticed immediately.
Frozen wordsTechnical terms, figures and proper nouns. “Photosynthesis” has no synonym; “54%” is not a word. Repeating them is correct.
Where the marks actually are
Lexical Resource does not count unusual words. It assesses range, precision and control — whether you have enough words to say what you mean, whether the ones you chose mean it, and whether you can handle the grammar they bring with them. A rare word used wrongly lowers all three at once, which is why reaching for the most impressive available synonym is the most reliable way to lose marks on the criterion it was meant to raise.
There is a second, quieter cost. Words copied straight from the prompt are not counted as your language, so an introduction that reuses the prompt’s nouns has produced fewer words for the examiner to assess than it appears to. The sentence looks full and is, for scoring purposes, half empty — and it is the first sentence the examiner reads.
What it costs you to skip this
Two things at once. Words copied from the prompt are not counted as yours, so the opening sentence does no work at all; and a synonym that shifts the strength of a claim commits the rest of your essay to defending something the prompt never asked about. The second is the expensive one, because it damages Task Response as well as Lexical Resource, and it is completely invisible while you are writing.
Where it stops applying
Some words must not move. Technical terms have no synonym inside their own field — “inflation”, “photosynthesis”, “the internet” — and replacing them changes the topic rather than the wording. Figures and proper nouns are not vocabulary: “54%” stays “54%” and “Japan” stays “Japan”. And when the prompt’s key noun genuinely has no natural equivalent, repeating it once is correct; the fix is to move something else in the sentence, which is exactly what the other four techniques are for.