Start here · the long version
What task 1 introduction really asks you to write
The opening sentence of a Task 1 response says what the visual is, what it shows, and over what period — in words that are not the ones printed above it.
Why this one sentence has its own vocabulary
Every Task 1 paper hands you a title, and every title is a trap. It is right there, it is accurate, and copying it produces a first sentence that took no effort and earns no credit: words lifted from the question paper are not counted as your language. A response can therefore open with a perfectly true sentence that contributes nothing at all to the assessment.
What makes this fixable is that the sentence only ever does three jobs. It names the visual, it says what the visual does with its data, and it frames the period or the categories. Three jobs means three small sets of words, and those sets are almost entirely predictable — which is why this is the cheapest vocabulary in the whole exam to learn and the most reliably rewarded.
The one thing that must not move is the data itself. Figures, units, years and place names are copied deliberately and correctly. Paraphrasing “54%” is not vocabulary work; it is inventing data.
Name the visual“line graph”, “bar chart”, “table”, “process diagram”. Use the right one — a bar chart is not a graph in an examiner’s reading.
Say what it does“illustrates”, “compares”, “gives information about”. This is where the title’s verb gets replaced.
Frame the period“between 1990 and 2020”, “over a twenty-year period”. Years stay; the framing around them changes.
Never paraphrase dataFigures, units and proper nouns are copied exactly. Rewriting them invents numbers the chart does not contain.
What a good opening is not
It is not an overview. The introduction says what the visual is; the overview says what it shows. Merging them costs you the overview, which is the single most heavily weighted feature of a Task 1 response, and it is a mistake that looks like efficiency while you are making it.
It is also not a place for judgement. “The graph shows a worrying rise in obesity” has added a word the chart cannot support. Task 1 reports; it does not evaluate.
What it costs you to skip this
A copied first sentence is a sentence the examiner cannot count towards your Lexical Resource, and it is the first thing they read. It also sets the tone for the response: a paper that opens by repeating the title tends to keep repeating it, and the word-count target then gets met with the paper’s own words rather than yours.
Where it stops applying
Do not paraphrase what is data. Years, figures, units, currencies and proper nouns stay exactly as printed — a “paraphrase” that turns 2015 into “the mid-2010s” or £ into dollars has changed the chart. And do not stretch this into two or three sentences: the introduction is one sentence, and the space belongs to the overview.