Start here · the long version
What processes really asks you to write
Process language reports what happens at each stage, in the order it happens, using the passive because the diagram shows actions without showing who performs them.
Why the passive, and why it is not optional here
A process diagram shows things being done and almost never shows who does them. Clay is extracted, mixed and fired; nobody in the diagram is doing the extracting. That is the exact situation the passive exists for: it lets a sentence report an action whose agent is unknown, irrelevant or obvious. Writing “workers extract the clay” invents a doer the diagram does not contain, and writing “the clay extracts” is not English at all.
This makes the process the one Task 1 visual where the passive is the default rather than a choice. It also means the grammar has to be reliable across many sentences in a row: the right form of “be”, the past participle, and the preposition the verb carries with it. “Is transferred to”, “are removed from”, “is passed through” — the preposition is part of the verb and survives into the passive.
The second half of the vocabulary is sequence. With no figures to anchor a paragraph, the only structure available is order, and a reader who loses the order has lost the whole description. Signalling it explicitly at each transition is not padding here; it is the organisation the criterion is looking for.
The passive“is heated”, “are collected”, “is then transferred to”. The default voice, because the diagram names no agent.
Sequence markers“initially”, “subsequently”, “once this is complete”. The only structure a process paragraph has.
Present simpleA process is a general truth, so it stays in the present: “is heated”, not “was heated”.
The parts“stage”, “phase”, “by-product”, “raw material”. Naming them lets you refer back without repeating a whole clause.
Linear or cyclical, and why it matters from the first sentence
Processes come in two shapes and the difference decides your opening and your closing sentence. A linear process starts with a raw material and ends with a product; a cyclical one returns to its starting point, and saying so is one of the features an overview is expected to name. Describing a cycle as though it ended is a misreport of the diagram, and it is the single most common structural error on this visual.
The vocabulary for each is small and specific. Linear: “the process begins with”, “the final stage”, “the finished product”. Cyclical: “the cycle repeats”, “returns to”, “the process then begins again”.
What it costs you to skip this
Without the passive, a process description either invents people who are not in the diagram or produces sentences that are not English. Without sequence markers it becomes a list of facts in no stated order, which is a Coherence problem rather than a lexical one — and a reader who cannot follow the order cannot check whether the description is accurate at all.
Where it stops applying
A process has no quantities, so trend and comparison vocabulary has nothing to attach to: there is no “rose sharply” in a diagram with no axis. It also has no causes beyond the ones drawn — the diagram shows that heating follows mixing, not that heating is caused by mixing. And do not add stages the diagram does not show, however obvious they seem: an implied step is an invented one.