Skip to main content
Idiomas WeLearn

Task 2 · by section

Task 2 conclusion — the words this part of the exam actually needs

This is the language for one job: it restates the position in different words and closes without introducing anything new. The last three or four sentences, written when there are five minutes left and the temptation to paste the introduction is strongest. It is short, it is predictable, and it is the paragraph most often missing entirely.

The long versionwhat it is, what it costs, where it stops
19 entriesin 4 groups, each with its pattern
Guided practice3 steps, you write, then you compare
3 exercisesevery wrong option explains itself

Start here · the long version

What task 2 conclusion really asks you to write

A conclusion restates the position the essay argued, in words that are not the introduction’s, and stops. It adds nothing, proves nothing and introduces nobody new.

Why it is not a summary, and why copying the introduction fails

The instinct is to summarise, and the instinct produces the two failures that make conclusions worthless. The first is copying: an examiner who reads the same sentence twice, once at the top and once at the bottom, has been given no new language and no new thinking, and the words in it are counted once. The second is listing: three sentences that recap what each body paragraph said, which tells a reader who has just read them nothing they do not already know.

What a conclusion is for is narrower and easier. It answers the question again, now that the reasoning is behind it, and it shows that the answer survived the argument. That is why the vocabulary is mostly about referring back — “the evidence presented”, “for the reasons outlined” — rather than about restating content. You point at what you did; you do not do it again.

The paraphrasing pressure here is real and it is the reason this paragraph has its own vocabulary at all. Your position has already been stated once in your own words, so the conclusion needs a second set. This is where a writer who only knows one way to say their position runs out, and either copies or waffles.

Signal it

“In conclusion”, “To conclude”. One of them, once. Examiners look for the paragraph and a signposted one is easier to find.

Refer, do not repeat

“For the reasons outlined above”. Point at the argument instead of running it again.

Restate the position

The same answer, different words. Not the same sentence with two adjectives changed.

Nothing new

A new reason in the conclusion is a reason with no paragraph to support it.

The recommendation question

Whether to end with a recommendation depends entirely on what was asked. A problem–solution prompt invites one, and closing without it leaves the task half answered. An opinion prompt does not: “governments should therefore act immediately” at the end of an essay that was asked to what extent you agree has answered a different question, and it introduces a proposal the body never argued.

When a recommendation does belong, it needs the same specificity as any proposal in a body paragraph. “Something must be done” is not a recommendation, and it is the phrase that appears when the writer knows a conclusion should feel forward-looking and has nothing concrete to put there.

What it costs you to skip this

A missing conclusion costs on Task Response, and it is the easiest mark in the whole paper to lose because the paragraph is four sentences long. A copied one costs almost as much: it produces no new language for Lexical Resource and demonstrates no new thinking. And a conclusion that introduces a fresh reason damages the essay backwards, because that reason now has no paragraph supporting it.

Where it stops applying

It does not argue, does not add evidence and does not concede anything new. If the essay never took a position, no conclusion can rescue it — there is nothing to restate. And a recommendation only belongs where the prompt asked for one: appended to an opinion essay it answers a question nobody asked.

Examples · why precise words score better

The same sentence, twice

Lexical Resource is not a count of long words: it assesses range, precision and control. The fastest way to see that is to watch one sentence become precise. Nothing was added below except accuracy.

Vague

In conclusion, I think that public transport is better than roads because it is cheaper and better for the environment, as I said before.

Task 2 conclusion
Precise

In conclusion, the reasons outlined above make a strong case for prioritising public transport, notwithstanding the difficulties this presents in sparsely populated regions.

The vague version repeats both body paragraphs and then admits it with “as I said before”. The precise one points at the argument instead of re-running it, restates the position in new words, and carries the qualification the introduction promised.

What the precise version earns
precision · register · range. No page here promises anyone a score: these are the things the criterion looks at, and they are the things you can control.

The bank · grouped by the job each word does

19 entries, and the pattern each one demands

Knowing a word and not its pattern is what produces a sentence that reads like a translation. The preposition, the verb form and the article are the part that carries the marks.

Signalling the close

One of these, once. The examiner is looking for this paragraph.

In conclusion,

Safe to use

Opens the paragraph with a comma. The clearest signal available and never wrong.

To conclude,

Safe to use

Same position, same comma. Slightly less common, which is its only advantage.

On balance,

Watch the pattern

Opens with a comma, and it promises that two sides were weighed. Only if the essay weighed them.

In summary,

Watch the pattern

Opens with a comma, and it promises a summary — which invites the listing this paragraph should avoid.

In a nutshell,

Costs you marks

Conversational. It signals the close and drops the register in three words.

Referring back without repeating

Point at the argument. Do not run it again.

for the reasons outlined above

Safe to use

Ends or opens the clause. Refers to the whole argument in five words.

the evidence presented suggests

Safe to use

Takes a clause. “Suggests” keeps the strength honest — you presented reasoning, not proof.

as this essay has shown

Watch the pattern

Takes a clause after a comma. “Shown” is a strong claim; “argued” is usually the safer verb.

taken together, these factors

Safe to use

Opens with a comma. Groups the body paragraphs without listing them.

as I said before / as mentioned

Costs you marks

It announces that repetition is coming, which is the one thing this paragraph must not do.

Restating the position

The same answer in a second set of words. This is where a thin vocabulary runs out.

remains the stronger case

Safe to use

Takes no object: “restriction remains the stronger case”. Restates a position as a verdict.

this essay has argued that

Safe to use

Takes a clause. Commits without the personal frame and without repeating the opening sentence.

the balance of argument favours

Safe to use

Takes a noun or an -ing form: “favours restricting”, never “favours to restrict”.

notwithstanding

Watch the pattern

Takes a noun, not a clause: “notwithstanding the difficulties”. Carries a concession in one word.

I completely agree, as I said

Costs you marks

Repeats the introduction and says so. Two failures in one clause.

Closing forward, when the prompt asked for it

Only where a recommendation belongs — and then it must be specific.

should this trend continue,

Safe to use

A conditional clause plus a comma. Looks forward without predicting.

the priority should therefore be

Safe to use

Takes a noun or an -ing form. Names one action, which is what a recommendation is.

until X is addressed,

Safe to use

A clause plus a comma. Ties the outcome to a condition instead of forecasting it.

something must be done

Costs you marks

Recommends nothing. It is the phrase that appears when the writer has nothing concrete left.

Watch two · then the mistakes

The words doing their job in a real sentence

Worked example · In conclusion · the reasons outlined above · notwithstanding

In conclusion, the reasons outlined above make a strong case for prioritising public transport, notwithstanding the difficulties this presents in rural areas.

Why it works: Signalled, refers back without repeating, restates the position and carries the qualification the introduction promised — in one sentence and with no new content.

Worked example · Taken together · remains the stronger case · may shift

Taken together, these factors suggest that regulation remains the stronger case, though the balance may shift as the technology matures.

Why it works: “Taken together” groups the body paragraphs without listing them, and the closing hedge looks forward without predicting anything the essay did not argue.

In conclusion, as I said before, I think public transport is cheaper and better for the environment.

It announces the repetition and then delivers it, re-running both body paragraphs. Nothing here is new language and nothing is new thinking.

Repaired: In conclusion, the reasons outlined above make a strong case for prioritising public transport.

In conclusion, governments should also invest in cycling infrastructure and reform parking charges.

Two new proposals in the last paragraph, neither argued anywhere. A conclusion cannot support a claim, so a fresh one arrives undefended.

Repaired: In conclusion, the priority should therefore be sustained investment in the public network.

Now you try · with the scaffolding on

Build it one step at a time

Write the conclusion. Three sentences at most, no new content, and not one phrase reused from the introduction.

The material

Your essay argued that city centres should restrict private cars, on health grounds and on congestion grounds, while conceding that rural areas are different. Your introduction said: “This essay will largely support that view, while acknowledging that rural areas present a genuine exception.”

Step 1Signal the close and point at the argument

Choose one signal. Then refer back to the reasoning without restating either body paragraph.

8 more words before you can compare. Writing it yourself first is the whole exercise.

Step 2Restate the position in words the introduction did not use
Step 3Carry the concession, and stop

Exercises · production

Choose the word that does the job and takes the right pattern

Every wrong option is wrong for its own reason, and it says so. Nothing here is scored automatically.

In conclusion, ______ make a strong case for reform.

Choose an option first

The balance of argument favours ______ the scheme in the largest cities only.

Choose an option first

Your essay was asked to what extent you agree. Which closing sentence belongs?

Choose an option first

The rest of the vocabulary

Where else these words are needed

Message us